About your Search

20121108
20121116
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
cain in ohio, and came within two points. the technology included the so-called system, which was the republican get out the vote technology to ensure we targeted people to get to the polls. that imploded. i'm told on election day, actually, so many hits from around the country as it should have saying, gee, this person voted, this person didn't, target calls, thought it was under attack, and closed down. for those of you here from, again, the technology field with the politics, we, republicans, want to talk to you. [laughter] we need help. the democrat system is calledded gordon, it was effective at microtargetting, and i heard a lot of antedotes, and you'll love somebody gets a call who is a democrat in law school, and it was gee, you know, we see that you have voted, this information is public available. we see you voted at two o'clock on election day, but your sister, at two lane, has not voted, could you call her? that's the level at which they were dealing, whereas, you know, we were flying blind at that point. part of it is technology, and part of a turnout that was imp
and technology section security and privacy in information law provision. closest to me we have jason chipman. he was the department of justice to deputy attorney general counsel. prior to that reserve and national security division at doj were his work focused on cyberoperations and national security council issues. i would like to start this discussion by asking elisabeth preston to come and give her remarks. thank you very much. >> good morning. my role will be to provide a little bit of context. i am going to talk a little bit about terminology to make sure that we are on the same page about the terminology and i will give you a bit of a chronology for the types of events that we have seen over the past 10, 12, 14 years -- something like that -- to give you some context. my colleagues, when we discuss the application of law and the sorts of context, we can work with any context we are using. this is a really interesting topic. it is not only topical, but it is on the minds of the most important government officials including at the highest level and so on. but what if you're just a few commen
and that helped. it's the spirit and technology of the internet. >> and i suppose everybody saw this going on amazon.com and look at every binders in the thousands and thousands of comments. this finder just doesn't hope my comments. >> priority for standardized effect is. there are no women in it. >> was speaking associate media, one of the questions is prompted by treat from election evening. when we realize we had part of the historic results of this last week where he had 20 women in the u.s. senate, and historic number and rebecca rightly reminded us that it was in part because of things like emily's list that i want to have a conversation about the kind of institutions and the organizations that have been working quiet they all this time to make this moment possible. i don't have to say something about emily's list. >> families list within washington politics, it is an incredibly powerful force. at some point they were the largest organization. i don't know if that's still true, in the day of the super pacs, they are not the largest anybody. so emily's list is an organization that su
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)